Current:Home > StocksArkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure -Elite Financial Minds
Arkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure
View
Date:2025-04-18 19:09:45
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the state’s rejection of signature petitions for an abortion rights ballot initiative on Thursday, keeping the proposal from going before voters in November.
The ruling dashed the hopes of organizers, who submitted the petitions, of getting the constitutional amendment measure on the ballot in the predominantly Republican state, where many top leaders tout their opposition to abortion.
Election officials said Arkansans for Limited Government, the group behind the measure, did not properly submit documentation regarding the signature gatherers it hired. The group disputed that assertion and argued it should have been given more time to provide any additional documents needed.
“We find that the Secretary correctly refused to count the signatures collected by paid canvassers because the sponsor failed to file the paid canvasser training certification,” the court said in a 4-3 ruling.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision removing the nationwide right to abortion, there has been a push to have voters decide the matter state by state.
Arkansas currently bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless the woman’s life is endangered due to a medical emergency.
The proposed amendment would have prohibited laws banning abortion in the first 20 weeks of gestation and allowed the procedure later on in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman’s health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth. It would not have created a constitutional right to abortion.
The ballot proposal lacked support from national abortion rights groups such as Planned Parenthood because it would still have allowed abortion to be banned after 20 weeks, which is earlier than other states where it remains legal.
Had they all been verified, the more than 101,000 signatures, submitted on the state’s July 5 deadline, would have been enough to qualify for the ballot. The threshold was 90,704 signatures from registered voters, and from a minimum of 50 counties.
In a earlier filing with the court, election officials said that 87,675 of the signatures submitted were collected by volunteers with the campaign. Election officials said it could not determine whether 912 of the signatures came from volunteer or paid canvassers.
Arkansans for Limited Government and election officials disagreed over whether the petitions complied with a 2013 state law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for gathering signatures were explained to them.
Supporters of the measure said they followed the law with their documentation, including affidavits identifying each paid gatherer. They have also argued the abortion petitions are being handled differently than other initiative campaigns this year, pointing to similar filings by two other groups.
State records show that the abortion campaign did submit, on June 27, a signed affidavit including a list of paid canvassers and a statement saying the petition rules had been explained to them. Moreover, the July 5 submission included affidavits from each paid worker acknowledging that the group provided them with all the rules and regulations required by law.
The state argued in court that this documentation did not comply because it was not signed by someone with the canvassing company rather than the initiative campaign itself. The state said the statement also needed to be submitted alongside the petitions.
veryGood! (1355)
Related
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Nvidia replaces Intel on the Dow index in AI-driven shift for semiconductor industry
- Massachusetts firefighters continue to battle stubborn brush fires across state
- ‘Womb to Tomb’: Can Anti-Abortion Advocates Find Common Ground With the Climate Movement?
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Senior dog found on floating shopping cart gets a forever home: See the canal rescue
- Kevin Durant fires back at Stephen A. Smith over ESPN's personality's criticism
- Horoscopes Today, November 1, 2024
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- In Arizona’s Senate Race, Both Candidates Have Plans to Address Drought. But Only One Acknowledges Climate Change’s Role
Ranking
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Jill Duggar Details Complicated Relationship With Parents Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar
- Endangered Bats Have Slowed, But Not Stopped, a Waterfront Mega-Development in Charleston. Could Flood Risk?
- 'Taylor is thinking about you,' Andrea Swift tells 11-year-old with viral costume
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- Developer of Former Philadelphia Refinery Site Finalizes Pact With Community Activists
- 9 Years After the Paris Agreement, the UN Confronts the World’s Failure to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- A New Nonprofit Aims to Empower Supporters of Local Renewable Energy Projects
Recommendation
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
‘Womb to Tomb’: Can Anti-Abortion Advocates Find Common Ground With the Climate Movement?
Romanchuk wins men’s wheelchair race at NYC Marathon, Scaroni wins women’s event
Boeing machinists are holding a contract vote that could end their 7-week strike
Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
The man who took in orphaned Peanut the squirrel says it’s ‘surreal’ officials euthanized his pet
Nvidia replaces Intel on the Dow index in AI-driven shift for semiconductor industry
Senior dog found on floating shopping cart gets a forever home: See the canal rescue