Current:Home > reviewsThe Supreme Court weakens federal regulators, overturning decades-old Chevron decision -Elite Financial Minds
The Supreme Court weakens federal regulators, overturning decades-old Chevron decision
View
Date:2025-04-14 22:40:38
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Friday upended a 40-year-old decision that made it easier for the federal government to regulate the environment, public health, workplace safety and consumer protections, delivering a far-reaching and potentially lucrative victory to business interests.
The justices overturned the 1984 decision colloquially known as Chevron, long a target of conservatives.
Billions of dollars are potentially at stake in challenges that could be spawned by the high court’s ruling. The Biden administration’s top Supreme Court lawyer had warned such a move would be an “unwarranted shock to the legal system.” Chief Justice John Roberts qualified that past cases relying on the Chevron are not at issue.
The heart of the Chevron decision says federal agencies should be allowed to fill in the details when laws aren’t crystal clear. Opponents of the decision argued that it gave power that should be wielded by judges to experts who work for the government.
The court ruled in cases brought by Atlantic herring fishermen in New Jersey and Rhode Island who challenged a fee requirement. Lower courts used the Chevron decision to uphold a 2020 National Marine Fisheries Service rule that herring fishermen pay for government-mandated observers who track their fish intake.
Conservative and business interests strongly backed the fishermen’s appeals, betting that a court that was remade during Republican Donald Trump’s presidency would strike another blow at the regulatory state.
The court’s conservative majority has previously reined in environmental regulations and stopped the Democratic Biden administration’s initiatives on COVID-19 vaccines and student loan forgiveness.
The justices hadn’t invoked Chevron since 2016, but lower courts had continued to do so.
Forty years ago, the Supreme Court ruled 6-0, with three justices recused, that judges should play a limited, deferential role when evaluating the actions of agency experts in a case brought by environmental groups to challenge a Reagan administration effort to ease regulation of power plants and factories.
“Judges are not experts in the field, and are not part of either political branch of government,” Justice John Paul Stevens wrote in 1984, explaining why they should play a limited role.
But the current high court, with a 6-3 conservative majority, has been increasingly skeptical of the powers of federal agencies. Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas all had questioned the Chevron decision.
Opponents of the Chevron doctrine argue that judges apply it too often to rubber-stamp decisions made by government bureaucrats. Judges must exercise their own authority and judgment to say what the law is, they argued to the Supreme Court.
Defending the rulings that upheld the fees, President Joe Biden’s administration said that overturning the Chevron decision would produce a “convulsive shock” to the legal system.
Environmental, health advocacy groups, civil rights organizations, organized labor and Democrats on the national and state level had urged the court to leave the Chevron decision in place.
Gun, e-cigarette, farm, timber and home-building groups were among the business groups supporting the fishermen. Conservative interests that also intervened in recent high court cases limiting regulation of air and water pollution backed the fishermen as well.
The fisherman sued to contest the 2020 regulation that would have authorized a fee that could have topped $700 a day, though no one ever had to pay it.
In separate lawsuits in New Jersey and Rhode Island, the fishermen argued that Congress never gave federal regulators authority to require the fisherman to pay for monitors. They lost in the lower courts, which relied on the Chevron decision to sustain the regulation.
The justices heard two cases on the same issue because Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson was recused from the New Jersey case. She took part in it at an earlier stage when she was an appeals court judge. The full court participated in the case from Rhode Island.
___
Follow the AP’s coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.
veryGood! (99827)
Related
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Julie Su, advocate for immigrant workers, is Biden's pick for Labor Secretary
- Kim Kardashian Shares Twinning Photo With Kourtney Kardashian From North West's Birthday Party
- Fox News stands in legal peril. It says defamation loss would harm all media
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- 3 congressmen working high-stakes jobs at a high-stakes moment — while being treated for cancer
- Arnold Schwarzenegger Is Full Speed Ahead With Girlfriend Heather Milligan During Biking Date
- How to score better savings account interest rates
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- Titanic Sub Passenger, 19, Was Terrified to Go But Agreed for Father’s Day, Aunt Says
Ranking
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- To Equitably Confront Climate Change, Cities Need to Include Public Health Agencies in Planning Adaptations
- Charges related to Trump's alleged attempt to overturn 2020 election in Georgia could come soon. Here are the details.
- Deaths of 4 women found in Oregon linked and person of interest identified, prosecutors say
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- How Taylor Swift's Cruel Summer Became the Song of the Season 4 Years After Its Release
- Cardi B Is an Emotional Proud Mommy as Her and Offset's Daughter Kulture Graduates Pre-K
- Warming Trends: Swiping Right and Left for the Planet, Education as Climate Solution and Why It Might Be Hard to Find a Christmas Tree
Recommendation
Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
Kiss Dry, Chapped Lips Goodbye With This Hydrating Lip Mask That Serayah Swears By
FDA approves new drug to protect babies from RSV
How a civil war erupted at Fox News after the 2020 election
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
US Taxpayers Are Spending Billions on Crop Insurance Premiums to Prop Up Farmers on Frequently Flooded, Unproductive Land
NYC Mayor Eric Adams is telling stores to have customers remove their face masks
Rihanna Steps Down as CEO of Savage X Fenty, Takes on New Role