Current:Home > ScamsWisconsin judicial commission rejects complaints filed over court director firing -Elite Financial Minds
Wisconsin judicial commission rejects complaints filed over court director firing
View
Date:2025-04-14 04:45:26
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Judicial Commission this week dismissed complaints filed by the former state courts director after he was fired by four liberal justices of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, documents released to The Associated Press on Thursday show.
Three of the four targeted justices fired back Thursday, accusing the former court director who filed the complaints of breaking the law by making them public. By law, complaints before the commission must remain confidential unless the target of the investigation makes it public.
Randy Koschnick filed the complaints against each of the justices who fired him in August. He also filed a complaint against the person who replaced him, former Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Audrey Skwierawski. Koschnick talked about the complaints publicly at the time.
The commission should have admonished Koschnick or taken other disciplinary action against him, liberal justices Rebecca Dallet, Jill Karofsky and Janet Protasiewicz wrote in a letter they provided to the AP.
Koschnick said Thursday that he thinks he had a First Amendment right to talk about his complaint before he filed it.
“There is no basis for discipline,” Koschnick told the AP. “I did nothing wrong.”
Koschnick alleged in his complaint that Skwierawski cannot legally take office until July 2025 because the state constitution prohibits judges from holding nonjudicial offices until their terms end.
But the commission’s executive director, Jeremiah Van Hecke, said in a letter to each of the four justices that the commission determined there was no misconduct in hiring Skwierawski. In a letter to Skwierawski’s attorney, Van Hecke said the commission was dismissing the complaint, as she resigned her position as judge on Dec. 31 and is no longer subject to the commission’s jurisdiction.
Skwierawski’s attorney, Matthew O’Neill, said in a Thursday letter back to the judicial commission that Skwierawski was waiving confidentiality of the complaint to clear her name.
“She is gratified and vindicated by the Commission’s confirmation that her decision to serve the people of Wisconsin as interim Director of State Courts was legally, constitutionally and ethically sound,” O’Neill wrote.
The justices, in their letter to the commission, accused Koschnick of engaging in a publicity stunt by making his complaints public. Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, who was the subject of a complaint that was dismissed, did not join her three colleagues in the letter back.
“Judge Koschnick’s antics were nothing more than a partisan attempt to undermine the court’s authority to hire his successor,” Justices Dallet, Protasiewicz and Karofsky wrote.
By not taking action against Koschnick, the commission “will allow itself to continue to be an arrow in the quiver of partisan activists, reducing the public’s confidence in the judiciary.,” the three justices wrote.
The director of state courts is Wisconsin’s top nonjudicial court official and advises the Supreme Court on improving court processes while also overseeing court budgets and operations.
Koschnick, a former judge, was appointed to the role in 2017 by a conservative majority of the court.
The justices voted in December to make Skwierawski, who was initially named as the interim court director, the permanent director.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court flipped to liberal control in August after Protasiewicz’s victory in the April election.
The new liberal majority immediately set to work making sweeping changes, including voting to vastly reduce the powers of the conservative chief justice and last month tossing Republican-drawn legislative maps.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Cuba Gooding Jr. Settles Civil Sexual Abuse Case
- Why Tom Holland Is Taking a Year-Long Break From Acting
- How Much Damage are Trump’s Solar Tariffs Doing to the U.S. Industry?
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Has the Ascend Nylon Plant in Florida Cut Its Greenhouse Gas Emissions, as Promised? A Customer Wants to Know
- ‘This Is Not Normal.’ New Air Monitoring Reveals Hazards in This Maine City.
- Jennifer Aniston Enters Her Gray Hair Era
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- Targeted Ecosystem Restoration Can Protect Climate, Biodiversity
Ranking
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Keystone Pipeline Spills 383,000 Gallons of Oil into North Dakota Wetlands
- Danny Bonaduce Speaks Out After Undergoing Brain Surgery
- Louisville’s Super-Polluting Chemical Plant Emits Not One, But Two Potent Greenhouse Gases
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Man recently released from Florida prison confesses to killing pregnant mother and her 6-year-old in 2002
- Rumer Willis Recalls Breaking Her Own Water While Giving Birth to Baby Girl
- New York Assembly Approves Climate Bill That Would Cut Emissions to Zero
Recommendation
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Massachusetts Sues Exxon Over Climate Change, Accusing the Oil Giant of Fraud
Biden’s Climate Credibility May Hinge on Whether He Makes Good on U.S. Financial Commitments to Developing Nations
Anxiety Mounts Abroad About Climate Leadership and the Volatile U.S. Election
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
Katherine Heigl Addresses Her “Bad Guy” Reputation in Grey’s Anatomy Reunion With Ellen Pompeo
The US Wants the EU to Delay Imposing Trade Penalties on Carbon-Intensive Imports, But Is Considering Imposing Its Own
Louisville’s Super-Polluting Chemical Plant Emits Not One, But Two Potent Greenhouse Gases