Current:Home > FinanceTexas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status -Elite Financial Minds
Texas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status
View
Date:2025-04-16 16:25:57
Sixteen Republican-led states are suing to end a federal program that could potentially give nearly half a million immigrants without legal status who are married to U.S. citizens a path to citizenship.
The coalition filed suit Friday to halt the program launched by President Joe Biden in June, saying in court filings that the Biden administration bypassed Congress to create a pathway to citizenship for “blatant political purposes.”
“This action incentivizes illegal immigration and will irreparably harm the Plaintiff states,” the suit says.
Under the policy, which started taking applications Monday, many spouses without legal status can apply for something called “parole in place,” offering permission to stay in the U.S., apply for a green card and eventually get on a path to citizenship.
But the program has been particularly contentious in an election year where immigration is one of the biggest issues, with many Republicans attacking the policy and contending it is essentially a form of amnesty for people who broke the law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement Friday that the plan “violates the Constitution and actively worsens the illegal immigration disaster that is hurting Texas and our country.”
The suit filed against the Department of Homeland Security, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and other Biden administration officials accuses the agency of attempting to parole spouses “en masse,” which the states contend is an abuse of power.
The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press.
The bipartisan immigration and criminal justice organization FWD.us noted the timing of the lawsuit — as Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic nomination for president — and said the program is in compliance with the law.
“The only motivation behind this lawsuit is the cruelty of tearing families apart and the crass politics of hoping a judge might do the bidding of the anti-immigrant movement,” the organization said in a statement.
To be eligible for the program, immigrants must have lived continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, not pose a security threat or have a disqualifying criminal history, and have been married to a citizen by June 17 — the day before the program was announced.
They must pay a $580 fee to apply and fill out a lengthy application, including an explanation of why they deserve humanitarian parole and a long list of supporting documents proving how long they have been in the country.
They apply to the Department of Homeland Security, and if approved, have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get work authorization. The administration estimates about 500,000 people could be eligible, plus about 50,000 of their children.
Before this program, it was complicated for people who were in the U.S. illegally to get a green card after marrying an American citizen. They can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.
veryGood! (37985)
Related
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- Compare the election-fraud claims Fox News aired with what its stars knew
- Get to Net-Zero by Mid-Century? Even Some Global Oil and Gas Giants Think it Can Be Done
- Collin Gosselin Pens Message of Gratitude to Dad Jon Amid New Chapter
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- Billy Baldwin says Gilgo Beach murders suspect was his high school classmate: Mind-boggling
- As Oil Demand Rebounds, Nations Will Need to Make Big Changes to Meet Paris Goals, Report Says
- For the Second Time in Four Years, the Ninth Circuit Has Ordered the EPA to Set New Lead Paint and Dust Standards
- Small twin
- Does Another Plastics Plant in Louisiana’s ‘Cancer Alley’ Make Sense? A New Report Says No
Ranking
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Warming Trends: Where Have All the Walruses Gone? Plus, a Maple Mystery, ‘Cool’ Islands and the Climate of Manhattan
- Wisconsin boy killed in sawmill accident will help save his mother's life with organ donation, family says
- Why Andy Cohen Finds RHONJ's Teresa Giudice and Melissa Gorga Refreshing Despite Feud
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- And Just Like That's David Eigenberg Reveals Most Surprising Supporter of Justice for Steve
- Q&A: Sustainable Farming Expert Weighs in on California’s Historic Investments in ‘Climate Smart’ Agriculture
- Q&A: With Climate Change-Fueled Hurricanes and Wildfire on the Horizon, a Trauma Expert Offers Ways to Protect Your Mental Health
Recommendation
Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
The IRS now says most state relief checks last year are not subject to federal taxes
Iowa's 6-week abortion ban signed into law, but faces legal challenges
Recession, retail, retaliation
The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
Expansion of I-45 in Downtown Houston Is on Hold, for Now, in a Traffic-Choked, Divided Region
This group gets left-leaning policies passed in red states. How? Ballot measures
Nearly $50,000 a week for a cancer drug? A man worries about bankrupting his family